Bombshell Report on Roy Moore Could Reshape Washington’s Political Landscape
On Thursday morning, we told you that the December 12
Alabama Senate race was something you should put on your calendar, especially
after Democrats’ big wins earlier in the week. But we had no idea what was
going to happen just hours later: The Washington Post reported that a
woman said Republican nominee Roy Moore initiated a sexual encounter with her
when she was 14 and he was 32.
The news could fundamentally transform the political situation
in Washington. If Moore loses next month — and we stress the word “if” — then
the GOP’s Senate majority goes from 52-48 to 51-49.
Why is that important? For one thing, it makes it much more realistic
for Democrats to capture control of the U.S. Senate in 2018. Democrats would
need to win Arizona and Nevada (two races where they have at least a 50-50 shot
of victory) and hold on to all of their vulnerable seats. That’s a tall order,
of course, but it’s much easier than having to put a Texas or Tennessee on the
map to win Senate control. Bottom line: If there’s a wave in 2018, Democrats
will have an easier shot of having to flip two Senate seats instead of three to
win back the Senate.
In addition, a 51-49 GOP majority in the Senate could imperil
the Republican tax plan. Senate Republicans are already having to walk a fine
line in placating Sens. Rand Paul (who opposes the tax increases in the GOP
plan), Bob Corker (who’s worried about increasing the deficit) and Susan
Collins (who is against some of the tax cuts for the wealthy). A 52-48 majority
means Senate Republicans can afford to lose two GOP votes, assuming all
Democrats oppose the legislation. But with a 51-49 majority, Republicans can
lose only one GOP senator.
Now you might say that there’s no way (or little way) that a
Republican could lose in Alabama, a state Trump won by a whopping 28 points in
2016. But consider:
·
Before yesterday, Moore’s lead was just in the high single
digits or low double digits, according to the polls. That isn’t a bulletproof
lead;
·
Moore has been a controversial figure in Alabama for more than a
decade;
·
Democratic opponent Doug Jones has owned the TV airwaves for an
entire month, with ads like this: “I can work with Republicans better than
Roy Moore can work with anyone”;
·
And the race is a one-on-one special election that takes place
two weeks before Christmas, so it will be a low-turnout affair. There is no
other race on the ballot.
This isn’t to say that it’s a slam dunk that Moore loses after
yesterday. But we’re not sure enough people realize how dangerous the political
situation is for the GOP.
And given the situation — as well as the facts that ballots have
already been printed and that state law mandates that a candidate must withdraw 76
days before the election to be removed from the ballot (and we’re a month
out now) — NBC’s Steve Kornacki reminds us of what happened in New Jersey in
2002:
“In 2002, New Jersey state law set a deadline of 51 days
pre-election for a party to switch candidates, but incumbent Bob Torricelli,
fresh off his reprimand by the Senate ethics committee and faced with
collapsing poll numbers, dropped out 34 days before the vote. Democrats went to
court to ask for a ballot switch anyway, and the state Supreme Court – regarded
as one of the most liberal in the country – gave it to them. Republicans howled
in protest and took it to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear the
case. Frank Lautenberg then subbed in for Torricelli, and won the election
easily.”
The lesson: A party that controls the local political power and
the courts can change the rules.
But right now, it doesn’t seem like Moore is going to withdraw
from the contest. "Judge Roy Moore has endured the most outlandish attacks
on any candidate in the modern political arena, but this story in today’s
Washington Post alleging sexual impropriety takes the cake," Moore
campaign chair Bill Armistead said in statement. "National liberal
organizations know their chosen candidate Doug Jones is in a death spiral, and
this is their last ditch Hail Mary."
Meanwhile, conservative writer Jonah Goldberg criticizes the
Republicans who are defending Moore. “… I cannot grasp why so many people think
it’s a good idea to stand by a man who, if elected, will serve as a negative
campaign ad made flesh. I get the argument that it’s a ‘binary choice!’ But
it’s a binary choice now, because a bunch of people who want to see the GOP
burn down made it one.”
Goldberg adds, “In the long run, a Senator Moore would cost
Republicans more seats than the one he might give them. He’d be an albatross
for every elected Republican, including President Trump, who will be asked to
take a side on every scene in the clown show Moore would bring to Washington.
And every conservative who ever denounces a Democrat for immoral behavior or
insane views will be asked, ‘Oh yeah, why did you support Roy Moore then?’
Saving Steve Bannon’s reputation as the leader of some (doomed) movement
certainly isn’t worth it, not for the cost to the GOP not to mention your own
souls.”
Want to understand why it appeared the GOP was racing for the
Moore exits? Goldberg captures that.
No comments