Gang Rape Victim Seeks Withdrawal of Case, Cites Family Intervention
A
24-year-old rape victim (name withheld), who was allegedly drugged and
gang-raped in a hotel at Lekki, Lagos, by two dropouts of Babcock University,
wants the criminal suit filed against the defendants withdrawn and totally
droped.The defendants are Don-Chima and one Olusegun.
The Complainant
made her withdrawal request during proceedings at an Ikeja Sexual Offences and
Domestic Violence Court on Thursday (today), via a “Letter of Withdrawal”
she send to the court via the Lagos state DPP .
The letter,
dated June 3, 2019, was addressed to the Director of the Directorate of Public
Prosecution and signed by the complainant.
The letter
which was read in court by Justice Abiola Soladoye, the complainant attributed
her decision to seek the withdrawal of the case to “intervention of family members”
and for the sake of her integrity.
Mr Akin
George, a Deputy-Director in the Directorate of Public Prosecution and lead
state prosecutor, however, opposed the complainant’s request.
He noted
that the complainant was in court for the continuation of her cross-examination
by the defence.
“We do not
have a directive from the office of the Attorney-General.
“My lord,
the Honourable AG is the complainant in this case.
“In every
criminal matter, victims are naturally witnesses and as we speak, there is no
AG in office due to the change in power.
“We are also
aware of the rules of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law which states
that even the Court of Appeal cannot stay an ongoing proceeding.
“Our office
initiated this action in court and there has to be a closure one way or the
other.
“My lord, we
have submitted issues for the respective decisions of this court.
“We will
bring the witness to state her position before the court, while we continue
proceedings and await directives from the AG’s office,” George said.
Responding,
defence counsel, Mr Tunji Ayanlaja (SAN), said while he shared the views of the
prosecution that Lagos State originated the criminal suit, he disagreed that
the absence of the AG had created a vacuum.
He also
sought the release of the defendants from prison.
“The
constitution is so clear that when we do not have an AG in office, the
Solicitor-General takes over the function of the AG. My lord, we are ready to
proceed.
“The
unfortunate thing is that the defendants have been in prison ever since. The
complainant, who is their (prosecution) witness, has developed cold feet for
one reason or the other; this development is replete in the letter by the
complainant.
“To meet the
end of justice, I apply that your lordship should consider releasing the defendants
on bail.
“At the end
of the day, no compensation will be paid to them. They are young men who have
languished in jail for four or five months,” Ayanlaja said.
After
listening to the submissions of the prosecution and defence, Justice Soladoye
said that the court would continue with proceedings, and that bail would not be
granted to the defendants because the court had already delivered a ruling
denying them bail.
“However, so
that these proceedings will not be an exercise in futility, a short adjournment
will be taken, pending directives from the office of the AG,” she said.
The case was
adjourned to June 18 for the continuation of trial.
No comments