Trump Impeachment Inquiry: New Claims Amid Public Hearing
President
Donald Trump directly asked about a Ukrainian investigation into his Democratic
rival Joe Biden, a top US diplomat has unveiled.
Bill Taylor,
the acting ambassador to Ukraine, told an impeachment inquiry that a member of
his staff was told Mr Trump was keen to push for the probe.
Mr Trump
says he does not recall making the remark. He denies any wrongdoing.
Mr Biden
hopes to run against Mr Trump next year. It is illegal to ask foreign entities
for help to win an election.
He is
accused of withholding US military aid to Ukraine in order to pressure the
country's new president to publicly announce a corruption inquiry into Mr
Biden.
Mr Trump has
called the inquiry a "witch-hunt".
During a
detailed opening statement, Mr Taylor said a member of his staff had overheard
a telephone call in which the president inquired about "the
investigations" into Mr Biden.
The call was
with Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, who reportedly
told the president over the phone from a restaurant in Kyiv that "the
Ukrainians were ready to move forward".
After the
call, the staff member "asked ambassador Sondland what President Trump
thought about Ukraine", Mr Taylor said.
Mr Taylor
said: "Ambassador Sondland responded that President Trump cares more about
the investigations of Biden."
Meanwhile
observers and former officials have drawn attention to the security
implications of making the call from a restaurant, potentially exposing the
conversation to eavesdropping by Russian intelligence.
When asked
about Mr Sondland earlier this month, the president had said: "I hardly
know the gentleman."
Responding
to queries from reporters after the hearing, Mr Trump said: "I know
nothing about that, first time I've heard it."
He said he
recalled Mr Sondland's testimony, in which the diplomat said he spoke to the
president "for a brief moment" and Mr Trump had "said no quid
pro quo under any circumstances".
He did not
recall the phone call Mr Taylor described, "not even a little bit",
and "in any event it's more second hand information", he said.
The
impeachment inquiry has been going on for more than a month - but all previous
hearings were private, with reports based on leaks and sources speaking to the
media.
Wednesday's
public hearings were the first time the public heard from witnesses directly
and a chance for Democrats and Republicans to win over voters.
This has the
potential to be a major twist. Although there have been reports of Mr
Sondland's direct line to the president, there has yet to be evidence tying Mr
Trump directly to the alleged quid pro quo.
The phone
call Mr Taylor described could change all that.
In the
middle of Wednesday's hearing, the House Intelligence Committee announced a new
witness scheduled to give a closed-door deposition on Friday, an aide named
David Holmes - reportedly the aide Mr Taylor mentioned.
Next week,
Mr Sondland himself is scheduled to testify during public hearings.
If either of
these two men support Mr Taylor's account, it could undercut the president's
defenders who have suggested that Mr Trump was not closely involved in the
activities of the "unofficial" channel of Ukraine policy, as Mr
Taylor called it, which was pressuring Ukraine to open up investigations into
the Bidens.
Democrats
have reason to be pleased, while the president's team has a new set of
headaches.
Wednesday's
hearing began with testimony from George Kent, a top US diplomat charged with
overseeing European affairs.
He told the
committee that President Trump's private lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, ran a
"campaign to smear" the US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch,
before she was recalled from her post.
Meanwhile,
much of Mr Taylor's other testimony repeated evidence he gave to private
Congressional impeachment hearings, but he added new detail to the accounts in
the public domain.
The career
diplomat, who has served under Republican and Democratic presidents, reiterated
his understanding that the Trump administration threatened to withhold military
aid from Ukraine unless the Ukrainian president agreed to publicly announce an
investigation into Mr Biden.
He testified
that he told Mr Sondland and Kurt Volker, previously the US special envoy to
Ukraine, that it would be "crazy" to withhold security assistance for
the sake of domestic politics.
Adam Schiff,
the Democratic Chairman of the Intelligence Committee overseeing the
impeachment inquiry, said the purpose of the inquiry was to establish whether
Mr Trump "abused his power and invited foreign interference in our
elections".
"If
this is not impeachable conduct, what is?" he added.
The senior
Republican on the Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, who is a staunch ally of
the president, denounced the inquiry as "a televised theatrical
performance staged by the Democrats".
Republicans
have been demanding the anonymous whistleblower, who filed a report that
eventually triggered the impeachment proceedings, be compelled to give
closed-door testimony to the committee.
However, Mr
Schiff said he would "do everything necessary to protect the
whistleblower's identity".
Mr Trump
said he was "too busy to watch" the impeachment hearing, although he
also tweeted and retweeted several posts about the inquiry on Wednesday.
"I want
to find out who's the whistleblower," he told reporters after the hearing.
The US House
of Representatives is trying to establish whether Mr Trump abused the power of
his office for personal gain.
In a phone
call in July, the Republican president asked his Ukrainian counterpart to
investigate Democratic White House contender Joe Biden. His son, Hunter Biden,
worked for a Ukrainian gas firm while his father was US vice-president.
The US
congressional inquiry has already heard that Mr Trump dangled nearly $400m
(£327m) in military aid and a White House invitation in order to prod Ukraine's
leader to announce a corruption inquiry that might have caused political
embarrassment to Mr Biden.
It is
illegal to ask foreign entities for help in winning a US election.
Mr Trump has
denied the allegations and branded the impeachment hearings a "phony
showtrial".
Impeachment
is the first part - the charges - of a two-stage political process by which
Congress can remove a president from office. If, following the hearings, the
House of Representatives votes to pass articles of impeachment, the Senate is
forced to hold a trial.
A Senate
vote requires a two-thirds majority to convict and remove the president -
unlikely in this case, given that Mr Trump's party controls the chamber.
Only two US
presidents in history - Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson - have been impeached,
but neither was convicted. President Richard Nixon resigned before he could be
impeached.

No comments