Twitter Hides Trump Tweet for 'Glorifying Violence'
It
did the same hours later when the official White House account tweeted a copy
of the president's words.
Instead
of being deleted, both tweets can be viewed by clicking on a prominent warning.
It
says that "Twitter has determined that it may be in the public's interest
for the Tweet to remain accessible."
This
is the latest twist in an escalating row between Twitter and the White House.
Mr Trump
was tweeting about the US city of Minneapolis, which has seen consecutive
nights of protests following the death of a black man in police
custody
The president said
he would "send in the National Guard", and followed that up with a
warning that "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."
That
second tweet was hidden by Twitter for "glorifying violence".
Twitter's policy of
adding a warning to, rather than deleting, tweets that break its rules when it
comes to major public figures was announced in mid-2019. But the social network
has never used it on Mr Trump - nor deleted any of his tweets before.
"This
is the bravest and riskiest thing I've ever seen Twitter - or any social media
giant - do," said Carl Miller, from the Centre for the Analysis of Social
Media at UK-based think-tank Demos.
"This
pours rocket fuel over the online-harm-versus-free-speech debate. Online
content policy doesn't get more incendiary than this."
The same post remains unaltered on Facebook, without any
warning attached.
For years Twitter
resisted calls to treat Donald Trump like any other user and make him follow
its rules. Then, on Wednesday, it made a first small move, not removing a tweet
but adding a fact-checking link.
The
company then had two choices - hunker down and weather the storm or continue to
take action in accordance with its stated rules. It has now chosen the latter
course of action, calling the president out for glorifying violence.
Any
other user would have had their tweet removed, and might have seen their
account suspended.
It
now looks as though there is no easy way out for either of the two adversaries
- a huge battle over the limits of free speech and the rights of social media
firms to moderate content is looming.
The move means that
other users will not be able to like, reply to, or simply retweet Mr Trump's
post, Twitter said. However, they would still be able to retweet it with a
comment attached.
The
"historical context" is a reference to the phrase "when the
looting starts, the shooting starts", coined by Miami Police Chief Walter
Headley in 1967, in reference to his aggressive policing policies in black neighbourhoods.
A
later report submitted to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention
of Violence found that his "get tough" policy, involving "the
frequent display of shotguns and dogs by Miami police in black
neighbourhoods" contributed to a state of agitation in the black community
until the eruption of the 1968 Miami riot some eight months later.
Twitter
said: "We've taken action in the interest of preventing others from being
inspired to commit violent acts, but have kept the tweet on Twitter because it
is important that the public still be able to see the tweet given its relevance
to ongoing matters of public importance."
Hours
after the warning was added, President Trump tweeted: "Twitter is doing
nothing about all of the lies & propaganda being put out by China or the
Radical Left Democrat Party" and alleged that the social network was
targeting Republicans.
He
directly referenced the executive order he signed the previous evening, aimed
at removing some of the legal protections given to social media platforms.
Earlier
this week, Twitter used its fact-checking
function to attach warnings to the president's tweets for the first
time. That led the president to threaten to
"shut down" social networks over allegedly stifling free speech.
The
executive order signed by Mr Trump has no immediate effect on the social
networks, however - instead, it begins a lengthy process that may result in
changes down the line.
He
directly referenced the executive order he signed the previous evening, aimed
at removing some of the legal protections given to social media platforms.
FROM .bbc.com/news/technology
No comments