Former NIMASA Loses No Case Submission Apilication
Justice
Raliatu Adebiyi, of an Ikeja High Court has dismissed the no-case submission of
former Director-General, Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency
(NIMASA), Patrick Akpobolokemi and Ezekiel Agaba, former Executive Director on
alleged N754.8 million fraud.
The trial
Judge dismissed the no-case submission of the duo, following the adoption of
the final written addresses of the prosecution and defence counsels.
Justice Adebiyi
ruled that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the two
defendants on counts two, three, four, five and seven bordering on stealing,
warranting them to enter the dock to tell their own sides of the story.
She further
held that a prima facie case had been made against the second defendant on
counts nine, 10, 11 and 12, bordering on forgery.
The judge,
however, discharged and acquitted Akpobolokemi and Agaba of counts one, six and
eight bordering on conspiracy.
Adebiyi
adjourned the case until Sept. 19 for the defendant to open his defence.
Akpobolokemi and Agaba are standing trial on a
12-count charge bordering on stealing, forgery and conspiracy proffered against
them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Akpobolokemi
and Agaba, who were alleged to have defrauded NIMASA, were initially charged
alongside Governor Juan, Vincent Udoye, Ekene Nwakuche, Adegboyega Olopoenia
and a company, Gama Marine Nigeria Ltd., before the charge was amended to
involve only both of them.
The defence
counsel, Mr Collins Ogbonna and Emmanuel Onyeke, had on March 24 separately
adopted the final written addresses of their clients.
The counsel
had urged the court to uphold the no-case submissions and to hold that the
prosecution made no prima facie case against the defendants that would
necessitate them taking to the dock to defend themselves.
The EFCC
counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, in his counter argument, urged the court to rely on
the evidence placed before it by the prosecution and the testimony of the 12
witnesses called to dismiss the no-case submissions of the defendants as
lacking in merit.
“The
evidence before my lord establishes the essential ingredients of conspiracy,
stealing and forgery as the second defendant admitted the essential ingredients
of the offence both the conspiracy to steal, the conspiracy to forge documents.
“His
statement contains a confession which contains no further documentary evidence
for your lordship to make a finding of facts, substantively.
“We urge the
court to dismiss the no-case submissions as lacking in merit and to order the defendants
to open their defence as they have a lot of explanations to make,” Oyedepo
said.
Post Comment
No comments